How would Fox do it?

Powerline has done some great work in this piece. A congressional report states:

Given such uncertainty, the Administration's legal justification, as presented in the summary analysis from the Office of Legislative Affairs, does not seem to be as well-grounded as the tenor of that letter suggests.

So how does the Washtington Post report it?

The administration's legal justification 'does not seem to be ... well grounded.'

You are kidding, right? How about we try this one:

Given . . . legal . . . . analysis [the administration's position] does . . . seem . . . well-grounded.

If the Post fails to discipline people here, they've just dropped to New York Times level drivel. You're better off not reading them than reading them.