*Plain Jane*
from Monday, December 12, 2005
(Memories n!)
Interesting Kinsley piece in /Slate/ about how today's Jane Austens are
the HBO shows about show biz. The argument is strained, but fascinating.
(He also puts down /The Sopranos/, which I didn't see coming.)
But I want to talk about Kinsley on Jane Austen, not on HBO. At least
Kinsley seems to like her (compared to others). Nevertheless, here's
what he says about the opening line of her masterpiece, /Pride And
Prejudice/:
"Jane Austen's famous opening sentence ('It is a truth universally
acknowledged... [, that a single man in possession of a good fortune
must be in want of a wife]') is intended to flatter the reader with
feelings of worldly superiority to the claustrophobic society she writes
about."
I'm no Austen expert, but that's not how I read it. I think Kinsley is
missing the irony and humor. The "universal truth" has nothing to do
with what is being openly stated, nor are we supposed to feel too superior.
The next sentence makes the joke even clearer:
"However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his
first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds
of the surrounding families, that he is considered as the rightful
property of some one or other of their daughters."
Austen's point is not that rich single men all want or need a wife, but
that young women and the familes that can't wait to marry them off feel
it's their duty to convince every rich bachelor that he must get
married, usually to someone in particular, and before he knows what hit
him. And I'm not so sure, as Kinsley is, that times have changed so much.
by LAGuy 7/7/07
3 Comments:
I agree with your reading of the meaning of Austen's opening lines -- they make fun of the community so anxious to marry off their daughters to an eligible, wealthy bachelor that they see it as his "need" to get a wife. But is that necessarily inconsistent with Kinsley's assessment that this view of the community puts the reader in a position of amused superiority?
You may have a point, but I'm not sure how superior we're supposed to feel. Austen was exposing human folly, but should we see ourselves in her society, or should we look on from above?
The best critical analysis of Austen I've read is The Eyre Affair by Jasper Fforde.
Post a Comment
<< Home