Always True To You
There's an old saying that leaders are people who see what direction the crowd is going and rush to get out in front. Pundits can be that way, too.
Which brings me to Peggy Noonan. She's celebrating the Tea Party movement these days:
We may be witnessing a new political dynamism. The Tea Party's rise reflects anything but fatalism, and maybe even a new high-spiritedness. After all, they're only two years old and they just saved a political party and woke up an elephant.
[...] This election is about one man, Barack Obama, who fairly or not represents the following: the status quo, Washington, leftism, Nancy Pelosi, Fannie and Freddie, and deficits in trillions, not billions.
Everyone who votes is going to be pretty much voting yay or nay on all of that. And nothing can change that story line now.
Nothing, not even Peggy Noonan. But it's sure not the story line she believed two years ago:
[Obama's] rise will serve as a practical rebuke to the past five years, which need rebuking; his victory would provide a fresh start in a nation in which a fresh start would come as a national relief. [...] He is steady, calm, and, in terms of the execution of his political ascent, still the primary and almost only area in which his executive abilities can be discerned, he shows good judgment in terms of whom to hire and consult, what steps to take and moves to make.
[...] Whoever is elected Tuesday, his freedom in office will be limited. Mr. Obama is out of money and Mr. McCain is out of army, so what might be assumed to be the worst impulses of each -- big spender, big scrapper -- will be circumscribed by reality.
[...] But let's be frank. Something new is happening in America. It is the imminent arrival of a new liberal moment. History happens, it makes its turns, you hold on for dear life. Life moves.
It sure does. So enjoy it while you can, Tea Party, before Peggy finds someone better-looking to dance with.
3 Comments:
You can relax. No Tea Partier reads anything Peggy has to say. They do, however, read Hayek and certain ancient documents.
You mean like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion?
Hayek was an anti-Semite? Who knew?
Yes, anonymous, doubtless in your world the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is the most important of founding "texts" or whatever fevered "construct" gets you through the day.
Post a Comment
<< Home