It's alive!
Chris Cillizza sure is struggling to figure out why Rand Paul is attacking Bill Clinton as a sex predator.
Sure is a tough one. Does he hate Hillary? Is he an inbred? Is he cynically appealing to inbreds? Just can't quite get a grasp on it.
Focus, Chris. It's because it's true--the consequence of shameless lying in the face of actual facts is history, and the wonderfully successful (tm) affidavit squad of the 1990's will allow historians to dine out for eternity when it comes to presidential lying as an art form--and because that's the area that the Democrats and the Cillizza's would like to work in this election cycle. As the Blogfather says, it's battlespace preparation. (Quick, Chris-what are the first two words that come to mind when you hear "Bill Clinton"?)
Add to that you suddenly have even Ryan and Boehner saying publicly that the president cannot be trusted to enforce the laws, and holy smokes, it suddenly looks like the Republicans do have a brain and are using it to do something other than commit suicide.
5 Comments:
So this is some sort of Aqua Buddhist rant?
Close, but more released chakra.
I just want to see if I've got this straight. You think attacking a long-gone but highly popular Democrat President (all while making his wife seem more sympathetic) to remind everyone that Democrats hate women shows that Republicans finally know what they're doing. Yeah, next thing you know we'll have President Huckabee.
Release the hate, Anonymous, release the hate.
And send $100 to Wendy Davis.
It raises the question what would happen to Hillary's campaign if there was another Bill Clinton revelation, perhaps about something in the last ten years - say a child out of wedlock, or a massive cover-up? Would Hillary be forced to divorce Bill? What would Chelsea say? If someone has new goods on Bill, they won't release it till closer to the election. And it might be Joe Biden who fathers the leak!
Post a Comment
<< Home