Friday, August 18, 2006

Democracy In Connecticut

Many on the left have been complaining about Joe Lieberman's decision to run as an independent after losing in the Democrats' primary. (Those on the right are mostly sitting back and smiling.) I'm no fan of Joe, but their complaints go too far.

Look at this editorial by David Sirota. He accuses Lieberman of "undemocratic chicanery" and says "he's behaving like a Third World autocrat."

I see--hurting Democrats hurts democracy.

Partisans forget our two-party system is not part of nature, like molecules and gravity. Heck, it's not even in our Constitution. Democrats and Repulicans alone deciding who the public can choose, that's undemocratic chicanery.

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

According to the polls, what the Democrats want is to see to it that the most popular politician in Connecticut doesn't get to run. That's democracy?

12:33 PM, August 17, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought he did get to run in his party of choice of the moment....and lost to an unknown.

As much as I don't like him- I think Sanctimonious Joe should be free to run as an independent --if every primary loser went for a second bite of the apple in the general, then maybe primaries could become ignorable and the power of these extra-constitutional aberrations known as parties would be effectively reduced.

By the way what poll is it that shows the statement in comment 1? & How have Dems tried to block Joe's November windmill tilt?- with a little tepid rhetoric?

2:02 PM, August 17, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This notion that Lieberman should gracefully step aside is something I've been trying to figure out. When did politicians stop representing the voters/residents of their respective districts/states and start representing the party that they've (apparently) sworn fealty to?

Voters in CT have a luxury that we in IL don't enjoy. Had Lieberman lived in Illinois he'd be out; our supreme court has specifically denied the right to pursue a "sore loser" independent campaign. But hey. It's not like we actually *want* an independent politician in Illinois.

3:00 PM, August 17, 2006  
Blogger LAGuy said...

The trouble is so many districts are essentially fiefdoms of the Dems or Repubs that the primary IS the election.

1:54 AM, August 21, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter