Monday, May 03, 2010

Commence This

President Obama gave the commencement address at my alma mater, the University of Michigan. He took the opportunity to denounce those who criticize the government too harshly since it can lead to an atmosphere out of which comes violence. Furthermore, in a democracy, the government is, after all, us.

You know what? I don't like much being lectured by anyone about how we shouldn't go too far in criticizing the government. I especially don't need to hear it from the central emblem of that government.

When Ari Fleischer, White House spokesperson, responding to a question a few weeks after 9/11 said that people should watch what they say, commentators jumped all over him. Now we have the President, in a planned speech, warning us of the same thing. I'm waiting for a similar reaction.

The President isn't against criticizing government in general. He's just against criticizing government if you do it improperly. What is the dividing line? No one can say for sure, but we're on notice.

(The President, of course, has no trouble strongly criticizing government when it suits him. For example, the government--"us"--in Arizona passed an immigration law. The President responded before it was even signed, saying it threatened "to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans." He added if immigration isn't handled on a national level, it'll "open the door to irresponsibility by others."

Seems kind of harsh. Since he said that, there have even been protests that featured violence. But I guess it doesn't step over Obama's line. When the President does it, it's okay. But all you others out there, stop the namecalling--it's dangerous, and besides, government is great.)

PS Obama's example of why we need big government--our "small" government didn't have enough regulations to prevent Wall Street from causing the financial crash. It's arguments like these that should make us distrust government even more.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is hypersensitivity a trait of the tea party? Seems like a media strategy.

10:34 AM, May 03, 2010  
Blogger LAGuy said...

Perhaps you mistyped your comment. You must have meant hypersensitivity is a trait of those who oppose the Tea Party.

11:30 AM, May 03, 2010  
Blogger QueensGuy said...

Everyone sees the mote in the others' eye. I'd say it's a broad phenomenon.

To answer your question "What is the dividing line?" I'd say it's when you write a ransom note or order someone to put the money in the bag. Anything short of that I'm happy to protect. But then, I'm easy. Most folks are a lot more complex on this kind of thing. E.g. I have no problem whatsoever with folks calling a guy who crashes a plane into the IRS service center a patriot. But some do.

2:53 PM, May 03, 2010  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's not just about a line. It's the predictable hypocrisy. They said anything about Bush, including direct threats, and Obama and Bill Clinton's side didn't make a peep. If anything, they got offended when anyone suggested it was wrong to oppose Bush this way. Then Obama's in office and they have pretty run of the mill protest and it suddenly becomes unbearable. Next thing you know, you get actual violent protests calling anyone who supports Arizona a Nazi and that doesn't deserve coverage, except so far as it's justified because of what Arizona did. I'm for drawing a line between free speech and incitement, and even one regarding good taste, but that's got nothing to do with the political games these guys are playing.

4:58 PM, May 03, 2010  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think this demonstrates the hypocrisy pretty cleary:

http://www.breitbart.tv/hitler-paranoia-dangerous-political-rhetoric-whips-protesters-into-vulgar-frenzy/

9:31 PM, May 03, 2010  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter