Hate it when that happens
Geez, agreeing with Chris Cilizza? At least it's not Krugman.
posted by ColumbusGuy @ 3:00 AM
Pajama Guy
"You couldn’t have a starker contrast between the multiple layers of checks and balances [at ‘60 Minutes’] and a guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas writing.”
-Jonathan Klein, former CBS Executive
Contributors
Previous Posts
- Because instead of being dead, your loved one woul...
- Come Again?
- Isn't that called divorce?
- Before The Parade Passes By
- Plain language? We don't need no stinkin' plain la...
- Junior Walker
- Because that's what's important II
- The Show Is Dark And Full Of Terrors
- Libertarian rising
- Stars And Sunstein
2 Comments:
Hmm. The last time these indicators were this low, Obama and Clinton got elected (and Gingrich too I guess)
You agree with this nonsense? Trump's appeal, limited as it is, is easy to explain. He's for strongly limiting immigration and protecting jobs, and none of the other Republican candidate were willing to go along with that. There was a strong enough plurality among potential GOP voters to get him the nomination, especially when they were all busy beating up on Rubio. All the other stuff about his alleged appeal is relatively insignificant. Without this stance, he'd have had about as much success as Herman Cain.
So go ahead and agree with Cilizza. You're free to be wrong any way you choose.
Post a Comment
<< Home