Friday, June 17, 2016

Hate it when that happens

Geez, agreeing with Chris Cilizza? At least it's not Krugman.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmm. The last time these indicators were this low, Obama and Clinton got elected (and Gingrich too I guess)

4:11 AM, June 17, 2016  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You agree with this nonsense? Trump's appeal, limited as it is, is easy to explain. He's for strongly limiting immigration and protecting jobs, and none of the other Republican candidate were willing to go along with that. There was a strong enough plurality among potential GOP voters to get him the nomination, especially when they were all busy beating up on Rubio. All the other stuff about his alleged appeal is relatively insignificant. Without this stance, he'd have had about as much success as Herman Cain.

So go ahead and agree with Cilizza. You're free to be wrong any way you choose.

8:16 AM, June 17, 2016  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter