Wednesday, September 13, 2006

You Better Believe It

It always fascinates me how people come to believe certain things. One would hope we sift through the evidence and come to rational conclusions, but 1) we don't have time to fully investigate most things so we let rules of thumb guide us and 2) that's not how the human brain works, anyway.

There are numerous sites (here's just one) that have built up elaborate conspiraces about 9/11. I'm almost impressed in spite of myself. As always with well-developed crackpot beliefs, they're an odd mix of truth, half-truth and nonsense. And, for most followers, it's a closed system. No matter how successfully they're refuted, they come up with reasons to continue believing (often by simply refusing to believe the refutation).

At first I laughed at all this, but has it gone too far? In American alone (if anything, these ideas are more popular elsewhere), there are tens of millions who believe this stuff. It's tough enough to fight a war against terrorists when you understand how dangerous they are.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The huge majority of citizens will never have the ability to directly review evidence of things that happen- we rely upon experts or forums for truth (I've never seen a concentration camp or inspected NASA hardware but I fully believe that the Holocaust and the moon landing occurred). So evaluating the truthfulness of the message-deliverer is a key part of our belief systems. What der blogger types calle "mainstream media" has been kicked off its perch as the [perceived] objective dispenser of information and the President and other political actors currently seem to be more interested (or seem to be be viewed to be more interested in) in partisan advantage than in leading the nation and the blog and information world is too big and fractured to provide a vehicle for consensus.
The democratization of information has been a wonderful thing but it seems that conspiracy theories (which have always been around)thriving is one of the costs of living in a free-er society.
(Of course this all points back to Judge Posner's claim that individuals seek news & information not only to find our whats going on but to reinforce their existing views-

7:25 AM, September 13, 2006  
Blogger ColumbusGuy said...

That can't be original with Posner. Surely there are all sorts of psychological studies about the effect of being more ready to accept information that reinforces our views.

BTW, you've phrased it in an interesting way: ""individuals seek news & information not only to find our whats going on but to reinforce their existing views-"

That is, you've said people actively seek out reinforcing information, as opposed to being more receptive of it. Was that deliberate or incidental?

12:10 PM, September 13, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter