M. LK
Reader Larry King, who commented on our Star Wars post below, notes (I've cut his paragraph breaks):
I'm guessing you know the song "Californication"? Whenever I hear the line "Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement" it makes me think a lot about science fiction and real space travel. Most folks think science fiction boosted the space program, and that is certainly true in many ways. On the other hand, the USSR had a lot less SF than us, and yet had a great space program. We gave up on the moon once it got boring. Was that science fiction's fault?The moon landing is too dim a memory in my mind, but I remember watching the Viking landings and being disappointed. Mars didn't look at all like Edgar Rice Burroughs had described it. Maybe the average American's image of "outer space" really is the product of a Hollywood basement.The border between reality and fiction fascinates me. We have our own small world, and much of the rest of our imagination is filled out by fiction. Not just sf and fantasy, but stuff like cop shows giving us a (very false) idea of how cops work. (Some say CSI is hurting prosecutors since juries now expect great forensic evidence.) Look at our knowledge of America's western frontier, which for most is based on the movie version, which has about as much connection with the real west as Latin has with Pig Latin. A few weeks ago I noted it's Talk Like A Pirate Day, but of course, we don't really know how they talked, we know how movie pirates talk. The space program caught our attention when we were racing the Russians to the moon, but I guess after that it was bound to fall short if it had to compete against the images built up by science fiction.
4 Comments:
We gave up on space travel because it's too hard. It's too expensive and labor intensive. We'd love to land men on Mars, except we can't even afford to set up a space station on the Moon.
The head of NASA has predicted that China will be on the moon before we return there.
Neal Stephenson's brilliant rambling essay on just about everything, "In the Beginning was the Command Line", discusses the fact that many Americans' knowledge of the rivers of "darkest Africa" is based on a ride at Disneyland. Our elites consider this despicable and bourgeios. Stephenson points out that Americans simply don't have the time or money to visit central Africa. So he asks: are Americans better off knowing nothing about Africa, or are they better off knowing the Disney version of Africa?
It's a very good question.
Well this leads to questions as to whether science fiction space travel is really about space travel or something else. Star Trek was just as much about modern social issues and other ideas as it was about the future of galactic discovery and future technological development. You could say the same about Westerns and Police and Legal shows but the appeal of SciFi/Fantasy is that there is a wider universe to experiment and allowed authors/artists to go beyond the existing rules (including physical rules)and posit visions of an ideal or a possibility.
True, space travel today is not like Star Trek or most other scifi popular classics but we do have cell phones that resemble communicators, similar workstations and even a more diverse workforce (even if the phasers, beaming and uniform styles haven't really worked and lets not get started on the Universal Translator)
Sorry- That was me above- Google issues.
Post a Comment
<< Home