Best Scalia Mask

This has to be the funniest thing I've read in awhile.

Basically, we have Dave Kopel writing Dave Kopel's view of the Second Amendment, purporting to use a book by Stephen Breyer to show that the conservative view of the amendment is the right one, going so far to conclude that Breyer's work "strongly suggests that the D.C. gun bans are unconstitutional."

Nevermind that Breyer's book doesn't address the question.

Here's the method: Breyer's book asserts GOOD THINGS. GOOD THINGS includes what I think.

Ipso ergo QED.

Thanks, Dave. At least you didn't waste any ink.