Tuesday, January 15, 2008

The Wisdom Of Chuck Berry

While the Republican candidates have been tearing at each other for quite a while, the nasty intra-Democrat fights have only just started. One reason is the Repubs actually have serious differences. But I think the main reason is things have shaken out a bit and it's clear how close and tough a fight this is.

Unfortunately, when the Clintons attack Obama, a number of leaders in the African-American community see this as racially tinged. While it's amusing to watch Bill and Hillary being accused of this--as Democrats they probably figured they had a lifetime pass--it is a silly charge. More distressing is Obama's camp quietly and happily letting the accusations fly. (Though there are now claims that both sides are trying to calm things down--we'll see how this plays out.)

I have to wonder if this is a good strategy. Looking victimized because of his race may get him sympathy from African-Americans, who are a huge chunk of the Dem base, but this sort of stuff doesn't play nearly so well with whites, especially those who signed on with Obama because they figured he'd free them of their guilt.

Chuck Berry was once asked why he wrote songs for white people. He replied "are there more whites or blacks?" Whites are still the majority in this country, even among the Democrats. I doubt Obama letting this fester will help him get the nomination, and even if it does, I could still see it hurting him in the general election.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama has TRIED to stay out of the way of the Clintons' racist rantings. But it is hard to not be involved when at every turn you are asked about their ravings, and when even your no comments are taken as responses.

AAGuy

7:06 AM, January 15, 2008  
Blogger LAGuy said...

Obama saw this issue snowballing. He saw how more and more people were saying that African-Americans should be offended by the statements of the Clintons--that merely speaking out against Obama should make African-Americans angry--and (until recently) he seemed happy enough to let it fester. Also, his people had talking points listing all sorts of things the Clintons had said which could be construed (or misconstrued) as "racially tinged."

If he wants to be a "new" candidate who wants us all to work together, he'd take exception to these statements spoken on his behalf.

9:01 AM, January 15, 2008  
Blogger New England Guy said...

I can't agree that any candidate has the responsibility to correct the verbal blunders of another (yes if enough people react badly to it, its a blunder) but I would agree it is in both Obama's and Clinton's interest to cleave toward each other rather than get into a blood war. The split between the two (old party-identifiers vs. young independents) is not one that their side can really can have and win (Note Karl Rove's continuing comments about how "these candidates don't like each other"- he was pushing the "You're likeable enough" line as sexism in a WSJ column.)

11:47 AM, January 15, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're still missing the point. Obama has no chance to cop the democratic nomination. Hilary could screw up the real Election if she doesn't handle this issue correctly, especially if Barrack continues to throw gasoline on the fire...

2:40 PM, January 15, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are whole crowds just waiting to pounce on Hilary for acting female (crying) or Obama to act like a little country boy. If they even get close, watch the reports. Just like losing the first and winning the second constitues a comeback, there are so many cheap news sources, they try try try to make everything outrageous news.

7:39 AM, January 17, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter