Friday, November 06, 2009

Like A Rock

Here's a piece in the A.V. Club that says 30 Rock has had it. I don't know, maybe. But it's usually pretty hard to tell when a show jumps the shark until after it's canceled. Fans start to see the decline in no time at all.

The piece, by Todd VanDerWerff (really?), makes a lot of claims about varous sitcoms, many of which I find questionable. He thinks 30 Rock hit its peak in its late first season/early second season. Once again, maybe, but I didn't notice a big drop after.

Shows can go toward realism, which allows for depth but limits the plots, or they can go for outrageousness, which allows them to go anywhere, but generally makes the characters thin. (That's me talking, not VanDerWerff.) The general trend in most sitcoms, which may be the opposite of what you'd expect (and I'm not sure Todd would agree) is actually to make the characters more into caricatures as they go along. This is for at least two reasons. First, you start to learn what gets laughs, so you emphasize that part of the character. (Look at Ted Baxter, Cliff Clavin, Homer Simpson, everyone on Seinfeld--in the first season, they're almost normal.) Second, you need to go further afield for plots, and this allows you to put the characters in more ridiculous situations (or do the ridiculous situations create the caricature?).

The thing about 30 Rock is, almost from the start, they were not going for realism. I think the biggest question was would they concentrate on the show within the show, which could allow them to do sketches. They soon dropped that angle (which is one of the reasons they reshot the pilot, replacing Rachel Dratch with Jane Krakowski). Since then, they've been willing to go anywhere for gags--they've got more cutaways than any show this side of Family Guy--and their characters, already pretty wild, have become almost insane. That's why I don't understand why VanDerWerff is concerned when the show forgets that Tracy Morgan's character is a family man. I (and I think the audience) don't care if he's married or divorced or single.

This is the danger of 30 Rock, but also its promise. The lack of mooring allows them to do anything. We like the characters, certainly, but each week they can be reinvented--who likes whom, who's powerful, who's helpless, etc. But the thinness of the characters also means if they stop being inventive they can grow tiresome quickly. Looks like Todd VanDerWerff has had his fill.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gee why can't he sit back in and enjoy it? Hard to see that there has really been any arc beyond moving beyond the start-up phase (I actually think the normality phase of shows- although necessary building blocks are the weakest shows in rerun-Kenneth seemed odd and sitcommy fake at first but now he 's a member of the team)- just nutty characters in nutty situations. the plots are there to hang the craziness on and there is just enough to them to add continuity and keep things within some sort of bounds. Crazy things happen but everything returns to normal roles in the end. Personally while I think the Liz, Jack and Tracey are great roles- I think Jenna and Kenneth are key main characters as well. The writers, esp. Frank, provide great atmosphere (I completely forgot about the Frank wants to be lawyer storyline- the show is strong enough to roll over those hiccups). While the unexamined life may not be worth living, the over-examined sitcom kind of kills the appeal.

7:56 AM, November 06, 2009  
Anonymous Denver Guy said...

Yeah, I don't think 30 Rock spends one second worrying about continuity. I also think they have no intention of "developing" or maturing any o fteh charcaters (which is quite different from the Cheers, Friends, etc. line of sitcoms, but more akin to Seinfeld. It reminds me of several WSimpson's episodes where they have made oblique references to some of the most ridiculous situations of previous episodes - sometimes as if they happened, sometimes as if they never did ("Remmeber when Homer became an astronaut"). With no arc, no character development, there need be no end to the series (like The Simpsons, apparently). Shows like Cheers and Friends had to come to an end or turn into funny soap operas. I'm happy with 30 Rock's approach.

P.S. Verification word = preminer.

2:23 PM, November 06, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter