Thursday, March 17, 2011

Nick Of Time

I just read Nicholas Meyer's Hollywood memoir The View From The Bridge.  As the title implies, the emphasis is on Star Trek, especially his first mission, Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan (which he wanted to call The Undiscovered Country).  At first it seemed weird, since this is a guy who came to fame as a bestselling author and went on to write and/or direct a fair number of films and TV shows, only three of which have Star Trek in the title.

But the more you think of it, the more sense it makes.  It makes commercial sense, of course, since books about Trek sell.  More than that, however, it seems likely that Meyer's contribution to Star Trek is what he'll be remembered for.  When the story of Trek is written, Meyer isn't that far behind the show's creator, Gene Roddenberry, in importance.

Which is sort of funny, since Star Trek played almost no part in his life until he worked on it.  He'd heard of the show, but didn't watch.  And when he was shown some episodes, didn't think much of it.  Maybe that's why he was so helpful.  He approached the movie fresh.  Sure, he had to use the characters, and certain devices, but he wanted to make the story that stood on its own. (He was inspired by Captain Horatio Hornblower, and later discovered so was Roddenberry.)

Before Meyer came aboard to help write and direct Star Trek II, the show had been on quite a ride.  Its three-year TV voyage in the 60s wasn't that successful, but the fans refused to let it die, and it became hugely popular in syndication, spawning a whole Star Trek industry.  After the success of Star Wars, Paramount figured they should try a Trek movie.  They threw money at the project and created a horrible film in 1979 that made a profit anyway.  At this point, however, Paramount figured they needed to make a good sequel or the franchise might die.  Roddenberry, central in creating the first film, would remain connected in name only, and producer Harve Bennett would oversee the new production.

He had five different screenplays written and none of them were any good.  That's when he brought in Meyer, who was able to stitch together the good moments, add his own stuff, and deliver a script in a couple weeks--necessary to get the special effects done in time for the release date.

The budget for the film was slashed to one-fourth the original.  Meyer describes in great detail the shoot, including dealing with Shatner, Nimoy and Ricardo Montalban, all who presented different problems. Anyway, the film came out (hardly guaranteed), got great reviews and made plenty of money.  And Paramount has been making billions on new Trek movies and TV shows since.

The Wrath Of Khan is probably considered the best in the series.  I prefer The Voyage Home, but there's no denying Wrath revitalized the franchise and is filled with solid performances and iconic moments.

Meyer later helped write Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, which included ideas he hadn't been able to fit into his directorial debut, Time After Time (another time travel movie set in present-day San Francisco).  He also kept the basic Nimoy/Bennett concept of a cautionary ecological tale (which is actually the silliest part of a movie that's already close to a spoof).

IV turned out to be the biggest Trek hit yet, but the fifth film, The Final Frontier, which many figured would be the last with the orignal cast, was a disaster.  The critics hated it and the audience stayed away.  So Bennett and Nimoy (who had directed III and IV and was now producing) wanted one more shot, and brought back Meyer to helm The Undiscovered Country.  While not as great as II or IV, it's still pretty good, made money, and allowed them to go out with their heads held high.

Meyer, as you might expect, knows how to keep the narrative moving.  He tells a lot of stories about his various struggles, sometimes ending in success, just as often in failure.  Nevertheless, he manages to be entertaining no matter how much his heart was broken.

PS  He has a short chapter on an enjoyable but not particularly successful comedy he did with Tom Hanks and John Candy, Volunteers. (Hanks met his wife Rita Wilson on the shoot, just as Malcolm McDowell met his wife Mary Steenburgen on Time After Time. In both cases, Meyer was taking a chance casting an unknown woman--maybe he could have had a career as a matchmaker.) It has a script by TV veterans Ken Levine and David Isaacs.  It's interesting to read about it from Meyer's pont of view, since whenever Levine brings up the film on his blog, he complains (properly, in my view) that Meyer hurt the film by adding a gag that broke the fourth wall.

PPS  Unfortunately, like so many other books by entertainment figures, Meyer is happy to share his political views.  Here's a man who has great stories to tell about art and entertainment--even his speculation in these areas is of interest--but he's not a man who has any particular insight into the great issues of our day.  To be fair, he only spends a little time on his politics, but still, if someone dropped into one of his films a minute on something unrelated to the plot that stopped the action dead, he'd cut it.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Politics show up in most movies-- even if they are just in the unstated assumptions- you just seem to notice when you disagree

9:22 AM, March 17, 2011  
Blogger LAGuy said...

I'm not talking about politics in movies. Meyer's work often make fairly explicit political points, and don't forget he directed The Day After, the highly rated made-for-TV-movie about nuclear war between the U.S. and the Soviet Union (which I'm guessing seems a bit dated today).

I'm talking about a section of the book where Meyer stops everything dead and says, in essence, Well folks, we've been having a lot of fun, but let me explain to you for a second how deep and serious a person I am by explaining to you how important my political understanding of the world is.

9:33 AM, March 17, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Politics shows up in most movies? Sounds dangerously close to deconstruction to me.

2:52 PM, March 17, 2011  
Anonymous Lawrence King said...

A lot of time-travel stories use the idea of making money as a plot device. What's a quick way, in just one or two trips, to make lots of money with a time machine?

There are three common answers: buy collectibles (pay a dime for Action Comics # 1 in 1938), buy stocks, or bet on sports.

But just for fun, if I had a time-machine I would travel back to 1971 (two years after Star Trek was cancelled for poor ratings, a year when Baby Boomers defined everything that was 'hip' about America), walk up to a Vegas oddsmaker, and ask him to give me odds on whether, 40 years hence, Mr. Spock or Dr. Spock would be more famous. I bet I could get 1000-to-1 odds from him, and he could choose whatever verification mechanism he wanted. No matter what he chose, I'd win.

But in an alternate universe where Star Trek: The Motion Picture was followed by an equally expensive and boring sequel, then ST might never have broken into the movie market in an era dominated by Lucas and Spielberg, and the franchise might have ended then and there.

2:59 PM, March 18, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The fastest way to make money if you can travel to the future and back is to find out the winning lottery numbers.

10:54 AM, March 19, 2011  
Blogger LAGuy said...

So Baby Boomers decided what was hip in 1971. When did they stop deciding?

11:24 AM, March 19, 2011  
Anonymous Lawrence King said...

A couple days ago I posted a second comment about Wrath of Khan, explaining how I used to consider it the best of the franchise but these days I agree with you that it's second to STIV. And my comment vanished. Oh well.

LAGuy wrote:

So Baby Boomers decided what was hip in 1971. When did they stop deciding?

Baby boomers still have huge power. But do they choose "hip" anymore? I don't think so, although you would be a better judge than I.

There are some TV and movie producers who are still very influential over what is cool -- James Cameron, Chuck Lorre. Yet Joss Whedon and Guillermo del Toro are too young to be a boomer, although a bit too old to be Gen-X (they were both born the same year as me). Christopher Nolan is Gen-X; so is the director of The King's Speech. And when it comes to actors, most of the biggest names these days seem to be Gen-Y and younger.

But that's just my quick impression -- I am not really plugged in enough to hipness to say. I can only name two Taylor Swift songs. But I do know she's no baby boomer....

6:40 PM, March 20, 2011  
Anonymous Lawrence King said...

Above, my paragraph should read, "There are some baby boomer TV and movie producers who ...."

6:41 PM, March 20, 2011  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter