A Bad Spell

This is Commentary quoting Hendrik Hertzberg on Obama in The New Yorker:

His stimulus package asked for too little and got less. He has allowed deficits and debt to supercede mass unemployment as the emergency of the moment.

Really?  The New Yorker doesn't want to spell it "supersede"?

(I've posted before on Hertzberg whining about how Obama isn't liberal enough. It's his favorite subject. And I've posted before on his problem with spelling.)

A bit later in the piece, we get this:

Rather than take into account the economic (and empirical) failure of Obama’s Keynesian approach, those who take a dogmatic, faith-based approach to American politics engage in intellectual contortions in order to try to innoculate their ideology from damage.

Really?  Commentary doesn't know how to spell "inoculate."