Look Who's Talking
A few years back Live From New York: An Uncensored History Of Saturday Night Live, As Told By Its Stars, Writers And Guests was a bestseller.
Tom Shales and James Andrew Miller were listed as the authors. I suppose someone has to take credit, but should they be called authors? Shouldn't they be called interviewers, or compilers, or editors, or something like that? Shales and Miller did a fine job, but talking to a bunch of people and then arranging their words to form a coherent narrative is not really the same thing as researching and writing an entire book yourself.
I was thinking about that recently while in the library. It seems these oral histories of show biz subjects are getting more popular. In the New Books section I saw one for The Simpsons, one for NBC on Thursday nights, one--600 pages!--for MTV.
The format isn't bad. It's easy to read and offers lots of backstage story often told by stars. But it also a relatively lazy way to be called an author. (I wonder, do the audio books feature the original interviews?)
1 Comments:
Its not the same thing but its the same challenge to produce a product. Didn't Studs Terkel do this and win awards?
Post a Comment
<< Home