Thursday, December 05, 2013

Lovely Megan

Megan is lovely, but not quite clear on the concept:

"To do so is to send the message that you can hand out political benefits for your favored constituents right now and have someone else in another place pay the bill years later"

Uh, yes. She should spend less time worrying about policy makers' innumeracy and more about her own in-poli-sci-acy. Now if she spent time on reporters, editors and publisher's innumeracy, or the public's, that might be more interesting. (Not hers, of course; at least she's got that down.)


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Megan who? Fox? Mullally?

1:06 PM, December 05, 2013  
Blogger ColumbusGuy said...

Either. They're both babes, and here at PajamaGuy we don't discriminate.

2:01 PM, December 05, 2013  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter