Saturday, June 04, 2016

Wow, balance for the New York Times

I guess David Brooks is having an effect after all. As obvious as something like this is, an evergreen headline, really, ever since Bill and Hillary wrote out their first affidavits for others to sign against Jennifer Flowers, you just don't expect the Times to acknowledge that, and yet there it is:

Still, this is at best a thumbsucker of the sort LAGuy  regularly debunks, and hardly worthy of a newspaper. (Of course it's been a long time since we had any newspapers.)


Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see- you wanted to see who would click through. Its about Trump not President Clinton. I guess you could say Trump would be very open and clear about violating/ignoring/being unaware of the law. Whereis with HRC and most other pols, you need to balance JDs on a the head of pin to get there

6:14 AM, June 04, 2016  
Blogger ColumbusGuy said...

Now Anonymous, your head is surely bigger than a pin. Don't lose heart that we don't have any evidence to support the proposition yet; proving a negative isn't ever easy.

6:32 AM, June 04, 2016  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter