Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Spare Change

There's controversy over Obama saying you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig. It's an old line, of course, but, considering how Sarah Palin has become identified with lipstick, it appeared to many to be a reference to her. Obama may not have meant it, but it sure seemed his audience took it that way.

But I don't want to write about that. I'm more interested in what he said next: "You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called 'change,' but it's still going to stink after eight years." He's really mad that McCain is trying to claim he's the candidate of change. "How do they have the nerve to say it?" He asks.

This is how: "Change" has always been an empty and meaningless campaign slogan. Anyone can claim it, and most do. It's so non-specific, even a guy running for reelection could probably get away with it. And considering how McCain was not the clear choice of his base, it's even easier.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who's the candidate of change? The one who in his first presidential decision picks Joe Biden, or the one who picks Sarah Palin?

1:13 AM, September 10, 2008  
Blogger VermontGuy said...

I have a hard time believing that Obama would deliberately compare Palin to a pig (although, interestingly enough, I can see him calling McCain a "stinky old fish". Go figure) but the inference is clear enough ("oh, you misunderstood. I wasn't talking about them, I was talking about their policies").

As Obama himself has said "Words matter", and it's either disingenuous or downright stupid to use that phrase right now and not be aware of how it will be interpreted.

As with his "I don't have the votes to take your guns" statement, he does not seem to understand how to get his message across without the meaning becoming garbled.

If he's not careful, the eloquent orator is going to talk himself right out of winning this election.

6:12 AM, September 10, 2008  
Blogger New England Guy said...

She claims she's anti-pork. (apparently after it gets really really embarrassing) so the pig line is to undermine her. (thank you Mickey Kaus)

Still a stupid line (now is not the time for creative writing, guys). Obama should take a page from McCain in late 2007- fire all the expensive talent and party hackjobs and operate on a (at least a perceived) shoestring- He (as was McCain) is much more attractive as an insurgent than as the face of an old tired party establishment

11:00 AM, September 10, 2008  
Blogger QueensGuy said...

Speaking of change, this guy puts it pretty succinctly. Obama could learn something from him.

11:36 AM, September 10, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Lipstick on a Pig" McCain himself used the folksy metaphor a few times last year, including once to describe Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's health care plan. Even in the right-wing LAGuy's diatribe he makes it pretty clear Obama never meant to call Palin a pig. If it's a stupid line, they both like it and it sounds like McCain uses it more.

11:46 AM, September 10, 2008  
Blogger LAGuy said...

"Right-wing LAGuy?" Where do you get that stuff?

Regarding the line (which wasn't the focus of this post), what surprised me was Obama not being aware how it would be taken, since the audience saw it as a Palin reference right away.

12:53 PM, September 10, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a ridiculous, made-up controversy (by Palin/McCain). What happened to not whining about sexism? (Especially when it's fabricated.) All those no-nonsense feminists are sure to see through this one.

2:38 PM, September 10, 2008  
Blogger VermontGuy said...

Regarding the focus of this post (Sorry for the hijack, LAGuy),I think maybe the new mantra for the Obama camp might be "Loose Change".

3:28 PM, September 10, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter