Friday, January 15, 2010

Reading Reid

Michelle Obama says there's no need for Harry Reid to apologize to her because he's a good guy. "I measure people more so on what they do rather than the things they say." (A more succinct explanation of the double standard for Dems and Repubs I can't imagine.) I'd say there's no need for him to apologize to her or her husband because they weren't the main ones he insulted.

Let's recall what he said. Reid noted that since Obama is "light-skinned" and has no "Negro dialect, unless he wants to," he's a viable candidate.

This is a put-down of voters, implying they're racists who won't vote for dark-skinned candidates or those who sound too black. They're the ones he should apologize to.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Harry Reid's biggest mistake was apologizing at all and it has nothing to do with the substance of what he said. (Which seems to me more manufactured news than real news- ie its news because certain people keep saying it is but thats another post) I would say the same thing for Tiger Woods. Apologizing just declares open season on the apologizer and moves the conversation to how bad the apologizer is and invites piling on even from otherwise allies. Both would have benefitted from a "no apologies, no explanations" media strategy. Then the discussion would have been outrage over lack of remorse versus outrage at the underlying conduct (which I believe is a lesser, more easily extinguished outrage)

5:01 AM, January 15, 2010  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter