Correction of the Day
Well my team lost the Super Bowl, the halftime show was uninspired, and the whole production had the feel of an overdone expensive mediocrity. Except for the tiny Darth Vader, which could be seen before the game, most of the ads were disappointing or sucked (though I am starting to like the Groupon Ad- the Tibetans can take it (though I don't think they make fish curry)-they've put up with far worse- the real target was Hollywood).
But the real reason for this post was to make fun of Slate.com, whose interns this morning were either hungover or just not really football fans.
Corrections, Feb. 7, 2011: A headline on this item originally misidentified the Packers as a Florida team and misspelled Pittsburgh. Also, the item described the Packers as football's "most decorated team." In terms of Super Bowl victories, the Steelers have the more prestigious record.
2 Comments:
Pittsburgh was the better team, but you just can't give away the ball that many times.
Well I as a Steeler fan since 1972 think if the Steelers were the the better team, they would have more points than the Packers at the end of the game. (Up here, I've been listening all week to people claiming that the "better team" was at home this year- Tom Brady's team- those guys did win a bunch of SBs back when I was younger).
No doubt the Steelers had plenty of chances to win it but couldn't this year There were the turnovers but Green Bay also had 3 or 4 dropped passes that would have been big gains too(Although I give the Steelers some credit for that since it seems to happen every game- I think they cause the receivers to hear footsteps).
Well pitchers and catchers report in a week or so.
Post a Comment
<< Home