Wednesday, March 05, 2008

How To Elect An Independent

Last week NYC mayor Mike Bloomberg (again) officially said he's not running for president. Along the way he suggested, though, that he believes an independent could win the office in the future. I was a bit skeptical, but kept the thought in the back of my mind. So here's my theory on how it could happen sooner rather than later:

1. Despite going into the convention with a lead in the popular vote, number of states, number of pledged delegates, a deal is brokered to give Hillary the democratic nomination in a way that leaves a very, very bad taste in the mouths of the Obama supporters.

2. Obama supporters, particularly the young, tech-savvy ones (who have supported him overwhelmingly in this primary fight), recall that their organizational efforts relied very, very little on the democratic party establishment. Instead, they used social networking sites, youtube, and technological solutions for grassroots fundraising that bore little resemblance to traditional campaigning methods, and now they're going to have four more years to further refine their tools.

3. McCain beats Clinton, as the majority of disenchanted young democrats and blacks sit this one out.

4. McCain's first term does not go well.

5. Obama, or someone else who similarly grabs the popular imagination, decides to go it alone in 2012, backed by some start-up cash from vp-candidate Mayor Mike or elsewhere.

I know, I know, I won't quit my day job....

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some told Reagan to start a third party after he lost to Ford in 1976. He told them to get lost, but if he'd gone along with their plan, he would have both destroyed his career and the Republican party. The exact same thing would happen with Obama and the Democrats if anyone was insane enough to seriously suggest your plan.

12:37 PM, March 05, 2008  
Blogger QueensGuy said...

Agreed re Reagan. He would not have had the technological infrastructure to pull it off in '80. Neither did Perot in '92. Obama in '12 just might. Not saying whether it would be a good idea or a bad one, just that it may soon be possible.

12:47 PM, March 05, 2008  
Blogger New England Guy said...

While the parties in their present incarnation have been around since pre-civil War, there is no reason to just assume they will live on forever- one could argue that the world of instant information and greater communication ability (and acceptance) through the web, people are moving toward might lead them to eliminate the middlemen

2:35 PM, March 05, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We've had a two-party system almost from the start, and the only time we introduced a new party is when a previous party collapsed and was replaced with a new one. Barack going against his party would marginalize himself and hurt his own party--lose-lose.

3:01 PM, March 05, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes-Bad move for Obama personally but good move for the system which by definition (specific burden and general benefit) means it will never happen.

4:52 AM, March 06, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter